Baby Recall Check

Baby Recall Check › Walkers, jumpers and activity centers

Uuoeebb Infant Walkers Recalled Due to Risk of Serious Injury or Death from Fall and Entrapment Hazards; Violate Mandatory Standard for Infant Walkers; Sold on Amazon by BaoD

This recall involves Uuoeebb Infant Walkers. The infant walkers are collapsible with a round base, eight wheels, and seven adjustable height settings. They were sold in gray, black and pink. "Production Batch: 7654" is printed on a tracking label located under the seat.

Read CPSC's recall notice

Recall dateDecember 11, 2025
Recall number26141
UnitsAbout 2,650
HazardThe recalled infant walkers violate the mandatory standard for infant walkers because they can fit through a standard doorway and fail to stop at the edge of a step, posing a deadly fall hazard. In addition, the infant walkers have leg openings that allow the child to slip down until the child's head can become entrapped, posing a risk of serious injury or death.
RemedyConsumers should stop using the recalled infant walkers immediately and contact BaoD for a full refund. Consumers should disassemble the walker, remove the fabric seat, write "Recalled" on the top of the tray in permanent marker, and email a photo of the recalled infant walker to BaoD at Uuoeebbrecalls@outlook.com. Consumers should dispose of the recalled infant walkers in accordance with state and local waste disposal procedures.
Remedy typeRefund
InjuriesNone reported
Sold atOnline at Amazon.com from December 2024 through September 2025 for between $60 and $90.
DistributorHunan Suihuo E-commerce Co., Ltd., dba BaoD, of China
Made inChina
ContactBaoD by email at Uuoeebbrecalls@outlook.com.

Photos from CPSC

Recalled Uuoeebb Infant Walker in gray
Recalled Uuoeebb Infant Walker in gray
"Production Batch: 7654" on tracking label under the seat
"Production Batch: 7654" on tracking label under the seat

Copied from CPSC's recall record 10520, last published by CPSC December 11, 2025, read November 6, 2026. If anything here differs from CPSC's notice, CPSC's notice is right.